2010 Election analysis
Posted: 29 July 2010 12:31 PM   [ Ignore ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  16914
Joined  2005-10-19

(7/22 and 7/29 projection: 54 Democrats, 46 Republicans, or Republican gain of +5)
(7/14 projection: 55 Democrats, 45 Republicans, or Republican gain of +4)

Since our last analysis, we now have poll results for West Virginia. We are also changing the classification of two Senate races. In Missouri, Obama’s abysmal ratings have made it more difficult for the Democrat to capture this open Republican seat, and the Republican candidate has increased his poll lead from 47-45% to 48-42%. In California, a tossup Senate race has moved to “lean Democratic”, since the last three polls taken both show three term incumbent Boxer leading by more than 5%.

http://thehayride.com/2010/07/2010-elections-729-version/

Battle for Congress
and Governor – House Races

(7/29 projection:

256 Republicans and 179 Democrats, or Republican gain of +77

– 18 Democrats on the “watch list”)
 Signature 

Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.

This is known as “bad luck.” - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 July 2010 01:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2538
Joined  2008-07-11

The Senate prediction is a reasonable one. I would not be shocked to see the Democrats with 55 seats.

The house prediction is absurd. I cannot see the Republicans gaining 77. According to this link http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/house/2010_elections_house_map.html that would mean that the Republicans would have to pick up all their safe districts, all their likely districts, all of their lean Republican districts, all the toss up districts, and all but 5 of the currently held Democrat districts listed in “lean Democrat” while holding on to their two Republican districts that lean Democrat and losing LA02.

http://www.electionprojection.com/2010elections/house10.php lists the Democrats losing 30 seats (though I am not too familiar with that site, so take it with a grain of salt)

Personally, with all the extremist conservative candidates running, I do not see the Democrats losing either house. But even if the GOP does win back the house, it won’t be by taking 77 seats.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 July 2010 03:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  16914
Joined  2005-10-19

We shall see, but I think JMC may be correct.

 Signature 

Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.

This is known as “bad luck.” - Robert Heinlein

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 July 2010 12:30 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  921
Joined  2009-03-04
roux - 29 July 2010 03:00 PM

We shall see, but I think JMC may be correct.

JMC has proven about as accurate as they come.  If he says 77, that’s where my money is.

Profile