3 of 3
3
Wendy Cortez talks about Vitter’s Diaper
Posted: 27 February 2010 11:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 31 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8087
Joined  2007-07-26
KotexRepublican - 27 February 2010 05:05 PM

Avman - 27 February 2010 03:31 PM
righthandthief - 26 February 2010 07:35 PM
My record on exposing Vitter’s “sins” before they became public knowledge is impeccable. For example, I was one of the few bloggers talking about Vitter’s whoring years before he (sorta) admitted it.  I was discussing Wendy Cortez back in 2004, when “respectable” journalists and bloggers derided folks like me as hateful rumormongers who spread lies with no evidence. It didn’t bother me much because I knew that truth was on my side. So I’ve already been through this routine many times. Until the truth comes to light, I understand that I’m going to take some heat. No, I don’t have an old diaper with Vitty’s DNA on it, and no, I’m not going to give up the names of the guys who saw him so you can interview them. They’re private citizens, have families, and exposing their past hanky panky isn’t for me to do.

Let’s review: In addition to his chronic whoring in the Crescent City (which is a crime, btw), Vitter also was an unindicted co-conspirator in an illegal prositution ring in D.C.. Worse, it appears that one of the D.C. call girls he did business was his indirect subordinate, as she was a staffer on one of his committees on Capitol Hill. In the halls of Congress he took time out between votes to make calls to prostitutes. He did these things, and then lied about it repeatedly to the citizens of Louisiana. He called his critics liars and thugs, and vindictively denied job opportunities to a journalist who was pursuing the story.  He lied to journalists, and lied to a group of pastors who asked him about his “skeletons”.  Then, after getting caught he didn’t come clean about the entirety of his misdeeds, and didn’t feel he owed a truthful explanation about the scope of his “sins” nor did he answer any questions about his chronic, illegal behavior. Instead of truly fessing up, he went on to make a cagey, misleading denial about the “New Orleans stories” that he claims are “not true”. Well, there’s plenty of “New Orleans stories” that are true. So, this issue isn’t merely about the facts of Vitter’s “personal life”, as you call it.

But in your mind, Avman, all of this deceitful immoral illegal and hypocritical behavior becomes much much worse with the additional detail that Vitty was known to get his rocks off in a dipey, back in the day. That’s what really damaged his rep in your view. Honestly, I don’t really care what two consenting adults need to do behind closed doors to make sex more exciting. However, for a pampered whoremonger like Vitter to use a diaper gag in one of his pro-family political ads… that was just disgustingly creepy. Beyond the pale. (And, just to reiterate, I wasn’t the first blogger to mention Vitty’s sexual fetishes.)

I agree that it’s pretty juvenile to keep harping on that detail rather than dwelling on all the substantive things that should count against Vitter’s lack of character and unfitness to hold office. But that probably says more about the folks who traffic in this forum, more than anything else. As for my “little world” at YRHT, I’m quite proud of the regular conservative commenters who join the discussion at my site. Owen Courreges, for example, is one of the clearest and most compelling conservative voices in the Louisiana blogosphere, and I’m glad he regularly contributes to the policy debates at YRHT. (Tip: Owen can make his case without mentioning Hitler at the drop of a hat.) I wish conservative commentary here was even half as good as Courreges’ is at YRHT.

Oh, and as for the intellectual integrity thing I mentioned earlier, your unwillingness to address the issue head on is all I need to know.

Response deleted because it disclosed too much information.

I just read what you just deleted and it really wasn’t anything new that we havent heard from you, Avman, before!!!  You know, it is common for you to try to claim that you are above partisan politics and not a Repubican operative, while accusing other people of being just that (except, fortunately for you, these targets of your polemics are always dimocrat muslem/mooslem loving America haters, according to you).  Its fun reading what you write because what you write is always so consistently full of irony!!! 

You rehashed the Kip Holden smear job that you and another Republican politcal operative participated in last year, bragged about on this website, and blogged about it on your website, so that is nothing that you should have deleted!!!

Avman, you are an inspiration for so many Republicans.  I hate to see you bowing to political correctness and deleting your posts after you took so much time to make them in the first place!!!  That is something sissy dimocrats would do, not upstanding Republican operatives like yourself!!!

Actually you brought it up, and there was information that I have not disclosed before.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 09:58 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 32 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4206
Joined  2009-03-05

Larry Flynn is one the sorriest excuses for a human being that I can think of.  Every time I walk by his “Barely Legal” club in NO, I want to puke on the step.  That man’s sole purpose in life is to use people. 

If I were aligned with him on ANY issue, I would have to re-evaluate my position.  The fact that these leftist bloggers and Larry Flynn share the same position should be a major red flag to anyone reading the posts here.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 10:28 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 33 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  757
Joined  2010-02-13

Larry Flynn and David Vitter both love to take advantage of women for their own personal pleasure and only Vitter says that it wrong for others to do the same .

 Signature 

Obama and Jindal , The Wonder Twins .  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYAo4KvQgjQ

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 10:44 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 34 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8782
Joined  2003-10-08
conservative chick - 28 February 2010 09:58 AM

If I were aligned with him on ANY issue, I would have to re-evaluate my position.

I’d like to introduce you to Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell.

smile.gif

Falwellhustler.jpg

PS - focus on issues instead of personalities.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 12:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 35 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2175
Joined  2007-10-10
Avman - 27 February 2010 11:13 PM

KotexRepublican - 27 February 2010 05:05 PM
Avman - 27 February 2010 03:31 PM
righthandthief - 26 February 2010 07:35 PM
My record on exposing Vitter’s “sins” before they became public knowledge is impeccable. For example, I was one of the few bloggers talking about Vitter’s whoring years before he (sorta) admitted it.  I was discussing Wendy Cortez back in 2004, when “respectable” journalists and bloggers derided folks like me as hateful rumormongers who spread lies with no evidence. It didn’t bother me much because I knew that truth was on my side. So I’ve already been through this routine many times. Until the truth comes to light, I understand that I’m going to take some heat. No, I don’t have an old diaper with Vitty’s DNA on it, and no, I’m not going to give up the names of the guys who saw him so you can interview them. They’re private citizens, have families, and exposing their past hanky panky isn’t for me to do.

Let’s review: In addition to his chronic whoring in the Crescent City (which is a crime, btw), Vitter also was an unindicted co-conspirator in an illegal prositution ring in D.C.. Worse, it appears that one of the D.C. call girls he did business was his indirect subordinate, as she was a staffer on one of his committees on Capitol Hill. In the halls of Congress he took time out between votes to make calls to prostitutes. He did these things, and then lied about it repeatedly to the citizens of Louisiana. He called his critics liars and thugs, and vindictively denied job opportunities to a journalist who was pursuing the story.  He lied to journalists, and lied to a group of pastors who asked him about his “skeletons”.  Then, after getting caught he didn’t come clean about the entirety of his misdeeds, and didn’t feel he owed a truthful explanation about the scope of his “sins” nor did he answer any questions about his chronic, illegal behavior. Instead of truly fessing up, he went on to make a cagey, misleading denial about the “New Orleans stories” that he claims are “not true”. Well, there’s plenty of “New Orleans stories” that are true. So, this issue isn’t merely about the facts of Vitter’s “personal life”, as you call it.

But in your mind, Avman, all of this deceitful immoral illegal and hypocritical behavior becomes much much worse with the additional detail that Vitty was known to get his rocks off in a dipey, back in the day. That’s what really damaged his rep in your view. Honestly, I don’t really care what two consenting adults need to do behind closed doors to make sex more exciting. However, for a pampered whoremonger like Vitter to use a diaper gag in one of his pro-family political ads… that was just disgustingly creepy. Beyond the pale. (And, just to reiterate, I wasn’t the first blogger to mention Vitty’s sexual fetishes.)

I agree that it’s pretty juvenile to keep harping on that detail rather than dwelling on all the substantive things that should count against Vitter’s lack of character and unfitness to hold office. But that probably says more about the folks who traffic in this forum, more than anything else. As for my “little world” at YRHT, I’m quite proud of the regular conservative commenters who join the discussion at my site. Owen Courreges, for example, is one of the clearest and most compelling conservative voices in the Louisiana blogosphere, and I’m glad he regularly contributes to the policy debates at YRHT. (Tip: Owen can make his case without mentioning Hitler at the drop of a hat.) I wish conservative commentary here was even half as good as Courreges’ is at YRHT.

Oh, and as for the intellectual integrity thing I mentioned earlier, your unwillingness to address the issue head on is all I need to know.

Response deleted because it disclosed too much information.

I just read what you just deleted and it really wasn’t anything new that we havent heard from you, Avman, before!!!  You know, it is common for you to try to claim that you are above partisan politics and not a Repubican operative, while accusing other people of being just that (except, fortunately for you, these targets of your polemics are always dimocrat muslem/mooslem loving America haters, according to you).  Its fun reading what you write because what you write is always so consistently full of irony!!! 

You rehashed the Kip Holden smear job that you and another Republican politcal operative participated in last year, bragged about on this website, and blogged about it on your website, so that is nothing that you should have deleted!!!

Avman, you are an inspiration for so many Republicans.  I hate to see you bowing to political correctness and deleting your posts after you took so much time to make them in the first place!!!  That is something sissy dimocrats would do, not upstanding Republican operatives like yourself!!!

Actually you brought it up, and there was information that I have not disclosed before.

Some of that inside information that only a co-conspirator would know???

Dont be so modest, Avman!!!  We Republicans need our own guttersnipes and political operatives (it is always a plus when they have their own blog too, as you do!!!) to hit the dimocrat muslem communist America haters hard!!!

Avman, you are an inspiration to all aspiring Republican guttersnipes and political operatives!!!!

As Hardy Parkerson would say, keep up the good work!!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 05:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 36 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8087
Joined  2007-07-26
Trollfessor - 28 February 2010 10:44 AM

conservative chick - 28 February 2010 09:58 AM
If I were aligned with him on ANY issue, I would have to re-evaluate my position.

I’d like to introduce you to Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell.

smile.gif

Falwellhustler.jpg

PS - focus on issues instead of personalities.

I agree, focus on the issues and not the personality.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 08:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 37 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4206
Joined  2009-03-05

Your mothers must not have ever told you that “Birds of a feather flock together” or that “You’re judged by the company you keep”. 

Larry Flynt’s reason for living is to destroy lives.  Just read that “interview” for proof.  Why would anyone want to be a party to that?

BTW Troll, the Supreme Court’s position was to align with the First Amendment, not Flynt personally.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 February 2010 08:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 38 ]
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  757
Joined  2010-02-13

Glad to hear that people will judge Vitter by the company of the hooker he was keeping .

 Signature 

Obama and Jindal , The Wonder Twins .  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYAo4KvQgjQ

Profile
 
 
   
3 of 3
3