Right. And I mean RIGHT. This guy’s site says “All forms of leftism and liberalism are based on an atavistic belief in Black Magic. All are based on the primitive fear of the envious Evil Eye.” A fine example of Woody’s weird gang of kooks if ever I saw one. Thanks!!
Right. And I mean RIGHT. This guy’s site says “All forms of leftism and liberalism are based on an atavistic belief in Black Magic. All are based on the primitive fear of the envious Evil Eye.” A fine example of Woody’s weird gang of kooks if ever I saw one. Thanks!!
Damm, and here I was thinking they were just based on greed and laziness.
Right. And I mean RIGHT. This guy’s site says “All forms of leftism and liberalism are based on an atavistic belief in Black Magic. All are based on the primitive fear of the envious Evil Eye.” A fine example of Woody’s weird gang of kooks if ever I saw one. Thanks!!
The “connection” is that when Woody was running for the US Senate in 1996 (a race he lost because of Democrat midnight ballot-box stuffing in New Orleans’ 9th Ward - thus Mary Landrieu “won” by 5,788 votes out of 1.7 million cast), he hired a company, Impact Mail, to make automated “robo-calls” to voters.
When he discovered the company was also calling for his Republican competitor in the Senate primary race, David Duke - the “former Ku Klux Klan leader” the WSJ associates him with - he canceled the contract. Woody had been denouncing Duke and the Klan for his entire political lifetime.
Anyone who knows Woody, anyone who has done the slightest real research into his career, knows how much he despises racism of any kind, how much he detests KKK lowlifes. There is no legitimate uncontrived connection between him and the Klan whatever. Is there any proof this isn’t true?
Here is the FEC report which details the Duke connection: http://eqs.sdrdc.com/eqsdocs/0000016F.pdf Jenkins signed the
conciliation agreement. You may not like it, but it doesn’t mean it’s
not true. There’s nothing “blatantly” dishonest about it, as you say,
it’s a matter of legal record. And please give money to whoever you
support, that’s a vital part of our democracy. The Supreme Court has
ruled that political donations are protected by speech in the First
Amendment. Enjoy your weekend, Susan
Here is the REAL truth! Another smoke and mirrors act by Republicans stating something is a lie when it is based on fact.
To put this document in context you have to watch the following video. If you watch the video after reading the document, it shows that Woody Jenkins is a liar.
To put this document in context you have to watch the following video. If you watch the video after reading the document, it shows that Woody Jenkins is a liar.
To put this document in context you have to watch the following video. If you watch the video after reading the document, it shows that Woody Jenkins is a liar.
You must be getting something out of that video I’m not.
I did have my subliminal filter turned on.
In effect, I believe in the FEC settlement Woody agrees that he ordered Tony Perkins to list the money as paid to Bob Courtney so one couldn’t tell it went to David Duke. But in the video, he says he never did business with David Duke. There are some differences between the two stories.
He knew, he didn’t know,, bfd… He did the right thing. It’s not like he had a close 22 year relationship with David Duke, and now claims it didn’t affect him in any way.
He knew, he didn’t know,, bfd… He did the right thing. It’s not like he had a close 22 year relationship with David Duke, and now claims it didn’t affect him in any way.
No, what it shows is that Woody is a liar. You can’t agree to something in writing (the signed agreement) and say the opposite on the video. Did Woody think no one would read the agreement?
In the agreement (which is a legal document) Woody agrees to the following:
After the 1996 primary election in Louisiana, David Duke contacted Woody
Jenkins and recommended.that he use the services of a computerized phone bank system run by
Impact ‘Mail. Jenkins purchased several rounds of calls from
Impact Mail.. .
In the Video, Woody States that he never did business with David Duke. Thus, it is a lie.
Woody would have been better off to have just admitted that he did business with Duke. Now, he is just a liar. And, if an enterprising reporter were to ask the right people the right questions, it would become obvious that Woody did in fact deal directly with David Duke and that he was actually more than willing to do business with him. Further, it is a shame that Woody has thrown some people under the bus regarding this.
It will be up to the voter to decide whether this is an issue, but having a congressman that did business with David Duke and then lied about it is not something to be proud of. The national media will have a field day with this. In fact they already are.
He knew, he didn’t know,, bfd… He did the right thing. It’s not like he had a close 22 year relationship with David Duke, and now claims it didn’t affect him in any way.
Woody started a business relationship with David Duke long after he and everyone else knew of Duke’s political views and then when Woody realized the two of them could be tied together, he tried to hide it by using a third-party. And you don’t think that’s a big deal?
He knew, he didn’t know,, bfd… He did the right thing. It’s not like he had a close 22 year relationship with David Duke, and now claims it didn’t affect him in any way.
Woody started a business relationship with David Duke long after he and everyone else knew of Duke’s political views and then when Woody realized the two of them could be tied together, he tried to hide it by using a third-party. And you don’t think that’s a big deal?
It is a big deal. But what is an equally big deal is the fact that Woody is lying about this relationship. Dealing with Duke is one thing, but Woody is also a liar. Can people forgive him for dealing with Duke and being a liar? Pretty sad if they do.
He knew, he didn’t know,, bfd… He did the right thing. It’s not like he had a close 22 year relationship with David Duke, and now claims it didn’t affect him in any way.
Woody started a business relationship with David Duke long after he and everyone else knew of Duke’s political views and then when Woody realized the two of them could be tied together, he tried to hide it by using a third-party. And you don’t think that’s a big deal?
You have proof Woody knew the company had ties to DD??
